Showing posts with label Madelyn Olsen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madelyn Olsen. Show all posts

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Eight Dead as ‘Nordic Outbreak’ Sweeps Across Western U.S.

High winds, rain, flooding and snow moving eastward

A severe winter storm weather blanketed much of the western U.S. late Saturday, causing mass flooding, car crashes, road closures and leading to eight deaths.
Heavy snow and freezing rain led to more car crashes in New Mexico, where a 4-year-old girl was killed in a rollover accident. Three more people died in a weather-related crash in the Texas Panhandle, the Associated Press reports. The storm downed power lines and trees in California, killing three since it began Thursday. Meanwhile, Arizona firefighters found the body of a man who died in the high waters of the Santa Cruz River.
Forecasters said the “Nordic Outbreak” is moving South and eastward toward the Atlantic, with much of the Texas Panhandle under winter weather advisory until Monday.


Read more: Eight Dead as ‘Nordic Outbreak’ Sweeps Across Western U.S. | TIME.com http://nation.time.com/2013/11/23/four-dead-as-severe-weather-sweeps-across-western-states/#ixzz2mqQlhyVb

State grants help local farmers stricken by severe weather

Harry Childs grows vegetables at Brown Paper Bag Harry’s Farm in Franklin. The farm received money from the state’s Production Loss Assistance Needed Today agriculture grant program, which aids farmers whose operations have been affected by severe weather. Childs plans to improve the drainage throughout the field behind him, which flooded last spring.
Harry Childs grows vegetables at Brown Paper Bag Harry’s Farm in Franklin. The farm received money from the state’s Production Loss Assistance Needed Today agriculture grant program, which aids farmers whose operations have been affected by severe weather. Childs plans to improve the drainage throughout the field behind him, which flooded last spring.

By Ryan Blessing
rblessing@norwichbulletin.com
(860) 425-4205 

Posted Dec. 1, 2013 @ 6:06 pm 


FRANKLIN — Like other farmers whose land and crops were battered by severe weather earlier this year, Harry Childs is grateful for a state effort to help him get back on his feet.
“It’s a godsend,” said Childs, who owns the 20-acre Brown Paper Bag Harry’s farm in Franklin.
The state’s Production Loss Assistance Needed Today, or PLANT, grant program is helping Connecticut farms recover from this year’s storms and flooding, which damaged crops, buildings and equipment.
Childs, who grows vegetables, plans to use the funds to improve drainage on the property. Last spring, heavy rain led an underground spring below his fields to flood, severely damaging his crops.
“We’re putting in new drainage pipes,” Childs said.
Last month, the state Department of Agriculture approved 239 PLANT grants totaling $4,922,280.
Fifty farms in nine Windham County communities and 10 New London County towns received funding.
The agriculture department began distributing approved awards on Oct. 31 and has since delivered 90 percent of the emergency assistance to recipients, according to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s office.
Malloy established the PLANT grant program in June after touring flooded farms in the Connecticut River Valley.
Grant recipients may use the assistance to repair damaged property and equipment, replant lost crops, plant new or different crops in place of lost crops, buy feed to supplement lost hay, corn, and other crops for livestock and apply fertilizer and other soil care measures, as well as products to prevent disease and pest outbreaks.
“Severe weather events — the kind that were seemingly unheard-of in Connecticut when I was growing up — have become the new normal,” Department of Agriculture Commissioner Steven Reviczky said. “These grants are helping farm businesses not only recover today, but also strengthen agricultural infrastructure to better weather tomorrow’s tornados, hurricanes and blizzards when — not if — they occur.”
Peter Orr, owner of Fort Hill Farms in Thompson, said the PLANT grant program underscores the importance of agriculture to the state’s economy and aids in keeping the industry viable for the future.
“I appreciate the initiative that Gov. Malloy has taken to recognize the severity of the weather impacts on agriculture over the past year,” Orr said.
Grant applications were reviewed, approved and processed through a partnership between the state departments of Agriculture and Community and Economic Development, with additional administrative assistance from the Connecticut Farm Bureau Association.


Read more: http://www.norwichbulletin.com/article/20131201/NEWS/131209973#ixzz2mqQWNs9S

Severe weather in Chicago, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh may strike NFL games


Soldier Field groundskeepers are prepared for weather. (Nam Y. Huh / AP)
Soldier Field groundskeepers are prepared for weather. (Nam Y. Huh / AP)
Weather doesn’t usually dominate NFL storylines until late in the season, but in Chicago and other Midwestern cities, they’re preparing for severe weather.
Chicago is expected to bear the brunt of the storms, with the Bears hosting the Baltimore Ravens in a noon CST game. The wind at Soldier Field was kicking up during warmups, with the team bracing for storms (including the possibility of tornado warnings) that are expected to arrive around halftime and intensify in the second half.
“We’ve seen all kinds of weather in Chicago,” Tim LeVebour, Soldier Field’s general manager, said (via NBC Chicago’s Grizzly Detail blog). “We always talk about Bears weather, Bear football weather… this might be a little extreme.”
The team also is removing objects that could become airborne and reviewing evacuation procedures. “The priority is to get fans to safe zones in the event of severe weather,” he said.
LeFevour estimated that it would take 15-20 minutes to evacuate fans.
NBC report that this morning the city’s Office of Emergency Management and Communications warned of the possibility of wind gusts topping 70 miles per hour, along with lightning and large hail.

SEVERE WEATHER ALERT: Storm Causes Flooded Roads in West Virginia

Updated: Fri 5:16 PM, Dec 06, 2013

Huntington, W.Va. (WSAZ) -- Steady, hard rain from a winter storm caused rising water across roads in parts of West Virgina late Friday afternoon.
Authorities in Kanawha County received reports of high water or water across the roadways on Friday in these areas: Rocky Fork and Fishers Branch, the 1400 block Pennsylvania Ave in St. Albans, the eastbound lanes of MacCorkle Avenue at the University of Charleston, MacCorckle Avenue between Marmet and Chesapeake, East Dupont Avene at Calvary Lane in Shrewsbury, andGreenbrier Street at the Mill Creek Landing Apartments.
In Dunlow, the fire department reported that Route 152 was blocked in six different locations but that side roads were passable.
In places, the water was 4 or 5 feet deep. Drivers were advised to not try to pass through flooded areas.
WSAZ.com also received a photo from e-reporter Pam Shull showing a car submerged in water near the Huntington Mall.
Keep clicking on WSAZ.com for updates on the weather.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Space Weather Causes Airline Pilots, Passengers To Be Exposed To Radiation


Thanks to space weather, airline pilots absorb approximately as much radiation over the course of a year as a nuclear power plant employee, NASA officials revealed on Friday.
In fact, according to the US space agency, pilots are classified as “occupational radiation workers” by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) because they fly at heights where there is little atmosphere to protect them from cosmic rays and solar radiation.
For example, NASA officials said that during a typical polar flight from Chicago to Beijing, pilots are exposed to roughly as much radiation as if they had received a pair of chest x-rays. Over the course of their career, this can increase their risk of developing cataracts or even cancer – and passengers could also be similarly affected.
“A 100,000 mile frequent flyer gets about 20 chest x-rays,” no matter what the latitude of those flights are, explained Chris Mertens, a senior research scientist at NASA’s Langley Research Center. Of course, even non-flyers absorb some radiation from space weather, as cosmic rays and their by-products can reach Earth’s surface and expose people at sea level to levels equal to receiving one chest x-ray approximately every 10 days.
Flying on an airplane can increase the amount of radiation exposure 10-fold or more, NASA said. The exact amount of exposure depends on multiple factors, including the altitude of the plane, the latitude of the flight plan (polar routes expose passengers to more radiation), to solar activity and sunspot count, they added.
“To help airline companies safeguard passengers and personnel, NASA is developing an experimental tool to predict exposures in real time,” the space agency said. The project, which is being headed up by Mertens, has been dubbed NAIRAS or “Nowcast of Atmosphere Ionizing Radiation for Aviation Safety.”
According to Mertens, the number of flights that travel over the poles has increased drastically in recent years. Using polar routes during international flights are shorter and there are fewer head winds to deal with, he explained. As a result, these flights can save airlines up to $40,000 per flight in fuel costs.
However, as NASA officials point out, “Earth’s poles are where the radiation problem can be most severe. Our planet’s magnetic field funnels cosmic rays and solar energetic particles over the very same latitudes where airlines want to fly.  On a typical day when the sun is quiet, dose rates for international flights over the poles are 3 to 5 times higher than domestic flights closer to the equator.”
“If a flight controller wants to know the situation around the poles right now, NAIRAS can help,” they added. “It is, essentially, an online global map of radiation dose rates for different flight paths and altitudes.  Maps are produced in near real-time by a computer at Langley, which combines cutting-edge physics codes with realtime measurements of solar activity and cosmic rays.”
Currently, the project is in an experimental phase, Mertens said, but the goal is for NAIRAS to provide information comparable to land-based weather forecasts. In addition to the cost savings to airlines, the research team is hoping to help pilots better understand the radiation-related on-the-job hazards that they face.
A paper in which Mertens and this colleagues compare NAIRAS predictions with actual radiation measurements collected onboard airplanes will be published in the near future in the journal Space Weather. Mertens said that his team’s results “are encouraging, but we still have work to do.”

Source: redOrbit Staff & Wire Reports - Your Universe Online

Weather lessons from Superstorm Sandy

Doyle Rice, USA TODAY11:21 a.m. EDT October 28, 2013

Sandy was the second-costliest natural disaster in U.S. history.

sandy-satellite
It's the most infamous left turn in weather history.
One year ago this weekend, as Hurricane Sandy roared up the East Coast, it was about to make its unprecedented turn to the west, heading for its ferocious and tragic landfall in New Jersey as a "Superstorm" on Oct. 29, 2012.
How unprecedented? "We looked into the tracks of past hurricanes, and there's not a single track like Sandy," according to Peter Hoeppe, head of geo risks research with global insurance firm Munich Re.
In fact, in more than 100 years of weather records, "this is the only one that turned back to the west," noted National Weather Service director Louis Uccellini.
Sandy killed at least 117 people and caused $50 billion in damage in the U.S., making it the second-costliest weather disaster in American history behind only Hurricane Katrina, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The computer models meteorologists use to forecast weather eventually came together to forecast Sandy's weird path, though it took the main U.S. weather model a while to come on board: "Sandy taught us that our weather models are pretty good," said J. Marshall Shepherd, president of the American Meteorological Society and professor at the University of Georgia.
A week before Sandy hit land, Shepherd said, weather models picked up on a very complex interplay among the hurricane, a developing storm over the U.S., and an area of high pressure over the North Atlantic. It was this area of high pressure that prevented, or "blocked" Sandy from moving out to sea, instead driving it back toward the U.S. "The models nailed the very unusual 'hard left," Shepherd said.
This forecast allowed the weather service to warn emergency managers about the storm threat well ahead of time: "We certainly got people to act in the right way in terms of evacuations, closing subways, getting trains repositioned, and so on," said Uccellini. "We're feeling very good about that. Through our actions, countless lives were saved in New Jersey, New York, Long Island and New England."
WEATHER MODEL NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
However, there is admittedly room for improvement, especially in the American weather models, as it was the main European weather model that did a better job than the top U.S. model at first picking up Sandy's unusual forecast track.
"The discussion about the European vs. the American model performance probably helped to bring into focus that our weather assets are national assets, like aspects of homeland security or defense," Shepherd said. "Sandy helped to raise this issue and now the weather service has received support to help in this matter."
(Shepherd is referring to the $97 million that the weather service received to upgrade its forecasts, computer models and research budgets from the U.S. Congress' "Sandy Supplemental bill" earlier this year.)
Improved storm surge forecasts are also on the way in the next couple of years, Uccellini says, a needed improvement due to the tremendous damage that storm surge causes: It was Sandy's monstrous storm surge that wreaked the most havoc in New Jersey.
Also, Sandy forced the weather service to change the way that it forecasts hurricanes. Since Sandy was not forecast to be a hurricane at landfall, the weather service did not issue hurricane warnings as the storm approached, which led to some public confusion; at one point, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg downplayed the storm's ferocity, since it was not predicted to be a hurricane as it neared the coast.
But from now on, according to Uccellini, the National Hurricane Center will continue to issue advisories on storms even after they've gone "post-tropical" as Sandy did. This will allow for greater flexibility into how the hurricane center communicates about storms, he said.
A CLIMATE CHANGE CONNECTION?
Could more Sandys be in our future due to climate change? While no one claims that Sandy was due to global warming, Hoeppe said that some factors, such as warmer ocean waters, sea-level rise, and changing atmospheric patterns could contribute to stronger storms.
Overall, in the past 100 years, sea level in the New York region has risen about a foot, two-thirds of it caused by man-made climate change, according to Princeton University professor Michael Oppenheimer.
"Remember, Sandy was not a major hurricane — in fact it was barely a hurricane — but it was devastating to this populated coastal region," Shepherd said. "With increasing sea level, the public should be aware that it will not take Katrina- or Andrew-type storms to produce damaging surge and inundation."
Global average sea level could rise by more than 2 feet by the end of the century, according to the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
"I think, hopefully, Sandy has gotten academia, the private sector, and the federal government to move beyond 'lip service' on social science, communications and related research," he added. "I think we saw with Sandy and the tornadoes this year that we can have a great forecast, yet communications, perceptions and language barriers can still create loss of life."
And though this hurricane season has been very quiet, it's no time to get complacent: "It's just a matter of time before another big storm," said Peter Raab, head of property underwriting at Munich Re.
Contributing: Associated Press

Weather pattern could provide early warning for catastrophic U.S. heat waves

22 hours ago
Image of Salesman Lu Pichardo with an air conditioner
Matt Rourke / AP
In this file photo, salesman Lu Pichardo carries a customer's air conditioner at Appliances R Us in Philadelphia during a July 2013 heat wave. New research may extend long-range forecasts of heat waves, giving people more time to prepare.
The emergence of a newly identified atmospheric pattern is likely to provide two to three weeks advance warning that a stifling and potentially deadly heat wave will hit the U.S., according to a new study. Since current forecasts go out no more than 10 days, the additional notice could give homeowners, farmers, electric companies and hospitals critical time to prepare for severe heat. 
The precursor is a so-called "wavenumber 5" pattern, a sequence of alternating high and low pressure systems — five each — that ring the northern mid-latitudes several miles above the Earth's surface, according the research published Sunday in the journal Nature Geoscience
The more amplified the pattern, the more likely a heat wave will form over the U.S. about 15 to 20 days later, the researchers explain. In some cases, the probability is quadruple what would be expected by chance alone.
The pattern "favors the genesis, the formation, of U.S. heat waves," Haiyan Teng, an associate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., and the study's lead author, told NBC News. In the days leading up to a heat wave, the wavenumber 5 pattern slowly propagates westward around the globe, against the jet stream. Eventually, a high pressure system parks itself over the U.S.
"It just sits and you have persistent high pressure," Teng added. "And no rainfall. And hot temperature."
Fingerprint in the model
The scientists identified the pattern's connection to the pending formation of U.S. heat waves using a computer model that simulated 12,000 years of weather. The model allowed the team to collect thousands of heat wave examples and tease out the pattern from the atmospheric noise. 
Graphic of wavenumber 5 pattern
Haiyan Teng
This map of air flow a few miles above ground level in the Northern Hemisphere shows the type of wavenumber-5 pattern associated with US drought. This pattern includes alternating troughs (blue contours) and ridges (red contours), with an "H" symbol (for high pressure) shown at the center of each of the five ridges.
"Every climate model has biases, but we think this pattern is not just a pattern that exists in the model," Teng noted. "It has been noticed in nature by other studies." The problem, she explained, is that the observational record is so short — 1948-2012 — that too few extreme heat waves — just 17 — exist to reach a statistically significantly conclusion.
"In the model we can produce thousands of extreme events using this 12,000-year run and (the pattern) has a significant impact on heat waves. Therefore, we think this pattern may also have the same impact in nature."
Indeed, once the pattern was noted in the model, the team was able to tease it out from the atmospheric noise in several heat waves known from the observational record, including a series of heat waves and associated droughts in the 1950s.
Informing today and tomorrow
The identification of the pattern is important both as a tool for improved, longer-term forecasts in the current climate and advancing understanding of how the frequency and severity of heat waves may change as the planet warms, noted Noah Diffenbaugh, a climate scientist at Stanford University in California who was not involved with the new research.
"The longer lead and more accurate the warnings, the greater the potential for decreasing vulnerability and exposure in advance of an individual event," he told NBC News. "And there are many, many examples in the current climate where we haven't done that well enough and have suffered catastrophic consequences." 
John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. To learn more about him, visit his website.

St. Jude Day Storms: Damage, Power Outages in Britain, France, Germany

Gregory Katz Published: Oct 28, 2013, 0:43 PM EDT Associated Press
LONDON -- A major storm with hurricane-force gusts lashed southern Britain, the Netherlands and parts of France on Monday, knocking down trees, flooding low areas and causing travel chaos. Four deaths were reported.

Weather forecasters say it's one of the worst storms to hit Britain in years. Gusts of 99 miles per hour (160 kph) were reported on the Isle of Wight in southern England, while gusts up to 80 mph hit the U.K. mainland.
 
UK Power Networks officials said up to 270,000 homes were without power. Flood alerts were issued for many parts of southern England and emergency officials said hundreds of trees had been knocked down by gusts. At least 40,000 homes remain without power in northeast France.
Recent gusts are widespread and extremely intense across the German state of Schleswig-Holstein and adjacent sections of southern Denmark. A gust of 105 m.p.h. was measured in Glucksburg, Germany.
"This is not just a British storm," said weather.com meteorologist Nick Wiltgen. "Very strong winds will be sweeping into Denmark, southern Sweden, and northern Germany today en route to the Baltic states later on. The winds are even worse over the water, where we have seen sustained hurricane-force winds over parts of the North Sea."
Reports are beginning to come into German media outlets of downed trees, roofs being damaged, and windows being blown out in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany's northernmost state.
London's Heathrow Airport, Europe's busiest, cancelled at least 130 flights and express trains between central London and Gatwick and Stansted airports were suspended. Huge waves prompted the major English port of Dover to close, cutting off ferry services to France.
 
Thousands of homes in northwestern France also lost electricity, while in the Netherlands several rail lines shut down, airport delays were reported. Dutch citizens were warned against riding their bicycles -- a favored form of transport -- because of the high winds, and Amsterdam's central railway station was shut down by storm damage.
 
Some English rail lines also closed Monday morning, and some roads were closed due to fallen trees and power lines. There were severe delays on many parts of the London Underground and London Overground trains were delayed several hours.  
In Kent, police said a 17-year-old girl died after a tree fell onto the camper home she was sleeping in. Hertfordshire police said a man in his 50s was killed when a tree fell on a car in Watford. A teenage boy drowned Sunday after being swept to sea while playing in the surf at Newhaven.
 
Amsterdam police said a woman was killed when a tree fell on her in the city and advised people  to stay indoors.
 
The storm has hurricane-force gusts but is not classified as a hurricane since it did not form over warm expanses of open ocean like the hurricanes that batter the Caribbean and the eastern United States, according to Britain's national weather service, the Met Office.
 
Britain does not get hurricanes because hurricanes are "warm latitude" storms that draw their energy from seas far warmer than the North Atlantic, the agency said.
 
The storm is not named and does not have an "eye" at its center as hurricanes typically do. On social networks it has been called stormageddon.
 
Sweden's Meteorological Institute upgraded its advisory Monday, warning that a "class 3" storm that could pose "great danger to the public" as it hits western and southern Sweden in the evening.
 
Still, the damage was less than feared in the 48 hours leading up to the storm, when the British press raised alarm bells about a possibly catastrophic storm.
 
British Airways said its long haul flights were expected to operate normally but domestic and European flights were operating on a reduced schedule with some cancellations. It said Gatwick and London City airport operations should not be affected.

Monday, October 14, 2013

Fracking's impact on severe weather

Published 3:59 pm, Friday, October 11, 2013

(Flooding brought down a house in Jamestown, Colo., on Sept. 18. -Matthew Staver/Landov)

I am heartbroken over the pictures I've seen of the flooding destruction in Colorado. It particularly hits home because in 2006 flooding from an extreme, intense, isolated thunderstorm destroyed my vegetable farm in Youngsville, Sullivan County. In a few hours, torrents of water ruined three of my tractors, devastated my irrigation equipment and took away 60 percent of my topsoil. I couldn't recover, and it put me out of business.
In some ways I was lucky, especially compared to the people in Colorado. I didn't have to worry about toxic fracking chemicals that are linked to cancer, infertility, autism, diabetes, thyroid disorders and many more conditions poisoning my family, which is a real fear for people in Weld County, Colo.
I did not have a natural gas well pad or a wastewater containment facility on my land. I did not have condensation tanks or open pits that contained toxic fracking waste. That meant that the washout across my field had water in it and not toxic waste.
In New York, proponents of gas drilling say we can protect ourselves from this type of devastation by having better regulations. The tragedies in Colorado and the 2006 flood of my farm eviscerate this theory.
While the regulations in the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement, the conditions under which New York state proposed to regulate fracking, may be better than what they have in Colorado, history tells us they are unlikely to address a weather calamity like the Colorado flooding.
My farm was destroyed by what was considered a 500-year flood, but the SGEIS only seeks to prohibit wells in areas that are defined as 100-year flood plains. This flood plain definition has been rendered almost meaningless, as climate change has created a "new normal" where we are seeing the increased frequency of weather events that previously were defined as 100-year, 500-year and even 1,000-year occurrences. We experienced two 100-year floods and the 500-year flood in a five-year period.
Even if the proposed regulations were more stringent, our government does not have the ability or willingness to enforce regulations. A recent study showed the Department of Environmental Conservation has lost one third of its staff. And in case after case, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency has been walking away from dealing with fracking pollution.
Ironically, it is the carbon emissions from burning natural gas and other fossil fuels that is accelerating climate change, which in turn is increasing the intensity of storms.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has maintained a moratorium as the Department of Health and DECstudies the science on fracking. If there was ever a sign that fracking is not right for New York and we need to move to clean energy, the Colorado disaster is it.
Wes Gillingham is program director at Catskill Mountainkeeper.

Tornadoes: Has extreme weather increased in recent years?

Has extreme weather increased in recent years? The science is still unsettled on whether climate change has resulted in more intense hurricanes, so let's restrict our attention to tornadoes and heavy rain. There is evidence that global warming has caused an increase in very heavy precipitation events--the kind most responsible for major floods. However, there is no evidence that climate change has caused in increase in tornadoes and severe thunderstorms, though preliminary research suggests this may occur late this century.
Tornadoes
Are tornadoes and severe thunderstorms getting more numerous and more extreme due to climate change? To help answer this question, let's restrict our attention to the U.S., which has the highest incidence of tornadoes and severe thunderstorms of any place in the world. At a first glance, it appears that tornado frequency has increased in recent decades (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The number of tornadoes reported in the U.S. since 1950. Image credit: High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Source.
However, this increase may be entirely caused by factors unrelated to climate change:
  1. Population growth has resulted in more tornadoes being reported.
  2. Advances in weather radar, particularly the deployment of about 100 Doppler radars across the U.S. in the mid-1990s, has resulted in a much higher tornado detection rate.
  3. Tornado damage surveys have grown more sophisticated over the years. For example, we now commonly classify multiple tornadoes along a damage path that might have been attributed to just one twister in the past.
Given these uncertainties in the tornado data base, it is unknown how the frequency of tornadoes might be changing over time. The "official word" on climate science, the 2007 United Nations IPCC report, stated it thusly: "There is insufficient evidence to determine whether trends exist in small scale phenomena such as tornadoes, hail, lighting, and dust storms."
Furthermore, we're not likely to be able to develop methods to improve the situation in the near future.The current Doppler radar system can only detect the presence of a parent rotating thunderstorm that often, but not always, produces a tornado. Until a technology is developed that can reliably detect all tornadoes, there is no hope of determining how tornadoes might be changing in response to a changing climate. According to Doswell (2007): I see no near-term solution to the problem of detecting detailed spatial and temporal trends in the occurrence of tornadoes by using the observed data in its current form or in any form likely to evolve in the near future.

Violent tornadoes are not increasing
Violent tornadoes (EF4 and EF5 on the Enhanced Fujita Scale, or F4 and F5 on the pre-2007 Fujita Scale), though rare, cause a large fraction of the tornado deaths reported each year. These storms are less likely to go uncounted, since they tend to cause significant damage along a long track. Thus, the climatology of violent tornadoes may offer a clue as to how climate change may be affecting severe weather. Unfortunately, we cannot measure the wind speeds of a tornado directly, except in very rare cases when researchers happen to be present with sophisticated research equipment. Tornadoes are categorized using the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale, which is based on damage. So, if a violent tornado happens to sweep through empty fields and never destroy any structures, it will never be rated as a violent tornado. Thus, if the number of violent tornadoes has actually remained constant over the years, we should expect to see some increase in these storms over the decades, since more buildings have been erected in the paths of tornadoes.
However, if we look at the statistics of violent U.S. tornadoes since 1950 (Figure 2), there does not appear to be any increase in the number of these storms. In fact, there was only one tornado of EF5 intensity reported during the eight year period 2000-2007, the tornado that devastated Greensburg, Kansas in 2007 (although Canada did report its first EF5 tornado in history on June 22, 2007). The previous eight year period of 1992-1999 had six F5 tornadoes, so we can't say that climate change has caused an increase in the strongest tornadoes in recent years. Note that the EF scale to rate tornadoes was adopted in 2007, but the transition to this new scale still allows valid comparisons of tornadoes rated EF5 on the new scale and F5 on the old scale.
Figure 2. The incidence of violent (EF4/EF5, or F4/F5) tornadoes by decade since 1950. The asterisk by the decade of the 2000s indicates that the statistics extend only through February 2008. We can expect that another 20% of this decade's violent tornado activity will occur in 2008 and 2009.
The future of tornadoes
An alternate technique to study how climate change may be affecting tornadoes is look at how the large-scale environmental conditions favorable for tornado formation have changed through time. Moisture, instability, lift, and wind shear are needed for tornadic thunderstorms to form. The exact mix required varies considerably depending upon the situation, and is not well understood. However, Brooks (2003) attempted to develop a climatology of weather conditions conducive for tornado formation by looking at atmospheric instability (as measured by theConvective Available Potential Energy, or CAPE), and the amount of wind shear between the surface and 6 km altitude. High values of CAPE and surface to 6 km wind shear are conducive to formation of tornadic thunderstorms. The regions they analyzed with high CAPE and high shear for the period 1997-1999 did correspond pretty well with regions where significant (F2 and stronger) tornadoes occurred. The authors plan to extend the climatology back in time to see how climate change may have changed the large-scale conditions conducive for tornado formation.
Del Genio et al.(2007) used a climate model with doubled CO2 to show that a warming climate would make the atmosphere more unstable (higher CAPE) and thus prone to more severe weather. However, decreases in wind shear offset this effect, resulting in little change in the amount of severe weather in the Central and Eastern U.S. late this century. The speed of updrafts in thunderstorms over land increased by about 1 m/s in their simulation, though, since upward moving air needed to travel 50-70 mb higher to reach the freezing level. As a result, the most severe thunderstorms got stronger. In the Western U.S., the simulation showed that drying led lead to fewer thunderstorms, but the strongest thunderstorms increased in number by 26%, leading to a 6% increase in the total amount of lighting hitting the ground each year. If these results are correct, we might expect more lightning-caused fires in the Western U.S. late this century, due to enhanced drying and more lightning.
Using a high-resolution regional climate model (25 km grid size) zoomed in on the U.S., Trapp et al. (2007) found that the decrease in 0-6 km wind shear in the late 21st century would more than be made up for by an increase in instability (CAPE). Their model predicted an increase in the number of days with high severe storm potential for almost the entire U.S., by the end of the 21st century. These increases were particularly high for many locations in the Eastern and Southern U.S., including Atlanta, New York City, and Dallas (Figure 3). Cities further north and west such as Chicago saw a smaller increase in the number of severe weather days.
Figure 3. Number of days per year with high severe storm potential historically (blue bars) and as predicted by the climate model (A2 scenario) of Trapp et al. 2007 (red bars).
Summary
We currently do not know how tornadoes and severe thunderstorms may be changing due to changes in the climate, nor is there hope that we will be able to do so in the foreseeable future. Preliminary research using climate models suggests that we may see an increase in the number of severe storms capable of producing tornadoes late this century. However, this research is just beginning, and much more study is needed to confirm these findings. The lack of an increase in violent EF4 and EF5 tornadoes in recent decades implies that climate change has not yet increased tornado activity.
Heavy precipitation
Are heavy rain events becoming more frequent due to climate change? That is a difficult question to answer, since reliable records are not available at all in many parts of the world, and extend back only a few decades elsewhere. However, we do have a fairly good set of precipitation records for many parts of the globe, and those records show that the heaviest types of rains--those likely to cause flooding--have increased in recent years. According to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 report, "The frequency of heavy precipitation events has increased over most land areas". Indeed, global warming theory has long predicted an increase in heavy precipitation events. As the climate warms, evaporation of moisture from the oceans increases, resulting in more water vapor in the air. According to the 2007 IPCC report, water vapor in the global atmosphere has increased by about 5% over the 20th century, and 4% since 1970. Satellite measurements (Trenberth et al., 2005) have shown a 1.3% per decade increase in water vapor over the global oceans since 1988. Santer et al. (2007) used a climate model to study the relative contribution of natural and human-caused effects on increasing water vapor, and concluded that this increase was "primarily due to human-caused increases in greenhouse gases". This was also the conclusion of Willet et al. (2007).
More water vapor equals more precipitation
This increase in water vapor has very likely led to an increase in global precipitation. For instance, over the U.S., where we have very good precipitation records, annual average precipitation has increased 7% over the past century (Groisman et al., 2004). The same study also found a 14% increase in heavy (top 5%) and 20% increase in very heavy (top 1%) precipitation events over the U.S. in the past century. Kunkel et al. (2003) also found an increase in heavy precipitation events over the U.S. in recent decades, but noted that heavy precipitation events were nearly as frequent at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, though the data is not as reliable back then. Thus, there is a large natural variation in extreme precipitation events.
Pollution may contribute to higher precipitation
It is possible that increased pollution is partly responsible for the increase in precipitation and in heavy precipitation events in some parts of the world. According to Bell et al. (2008), summertime rainfall over the Southeast U.S. is more intense on weekdays than on weekends, with Tuesdays having 1.8 times as much rain as Saturdays during the 1998-2005 period analyzed. Air pollution particulate matter also peaks on weekdays and has a weekend minimum, making it likely that pollution is contributing to the observed mid-week rainfall increase. Pollution particles act as "nuclei" around which raindrops condense, increasing precipitation in some storms.
The future of flooding
It is difficult to say if the increase in heavy precipitation events in recent years has led to more flooding, since flooding is critically dependent on how much the landscape has been altered by development, upstream deforestation, and what kind of flood control devices are present. One of the few studies that did attempt to quantify flooding (Milly et al., 2002) found that the incidence of great floods has increased in recent decades. In the past century, the world's 29 largest river basins experienced a total of 21 "100-year floods"--the type of flood one would expect only once per 100 years in a given river basin. Of these 21 floods, 16 occurred in the last half of the century (after 1953). With the IPCC predicting that heavy precipitation events are very likely to continue to increase, it would be no surprise to see flooding worsen globally in the coming decades.
Jeff Masters

Tropical Cyclone Phailin: Hundreds of Thousands Spared

By Eric Leister, Meteorologist
October 14, 2013; 10:55 AM

The approach of Phailin, among the most powerful historical cyclones in the region, led to the evacuation of close to 1 million people according to CNN.Tropical Cyclone Phailin made landfall in northeastern India on Saturday, but advanced warnings and evacuations may have been what saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
Warnings of Phailin's potential arrival in northeastern India were sounded early this past week.
Reports of fatalities vary, but at this early stage, range upward to over a dozen people. It may be days until all people in the storm's path are accounted for.
An Indian woman returns to the cyclone hit Arjipalli village on the Bay of Bengal coast in Ganjam district, Orissa state, India, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2013. India began sorting through miles of wreckage Sunday after Cyclone Phailin roared ashore, flooding towns and villages and destroying tens of thousands of thatch homes, but officials said massive evacuation efforts had spared the east coast from widespread loss of life. The storm, the strongest to hit India in more than a decade, destroyed hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of crops, but more than 18 hours after it made landfall in Orissa state, officials said they knew of only nine fatalities. (AP Photo/Biswaranjan Rout)
While Phailin has weakened into a tropical rainstorm, rainfall from the once-powerful tropical cyclone is finally winding down.
The threat for widespread heavy rain and flooding is over across much of northern India, however some areas remain flooded after days of torrential downpours.
The storm has damaged or flooded many homes and other structures. Phailin displaced hundreds of thousands of people since making landfall in northeast India on Saturday.
In the wake of Phailin, efforts will now switch to recovery and aid.
A relief effort was underway early on Sunday, local time, as the military and relief workers began to make their way throughout the region in helicopters and trucks, Reuters reported.
People hold each others' hands and cross a water logged road as they return to their respective villages near Gopalpur, Orissa state, India, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2013. India began sorting through miles of wreckage on Sunday after Cyclone Phailin roared ashore, flooding towns and villages and destroying tens of thousands of thatch homes, but officials said massive evacuation efforts had spared the east coast from widespread loss of life. (AP Photo/Bikas Das)
Even though Phailin weakened slightly prior to landfall, destructive winds well over 160 kph (100 mph) and flooding rain of at least 200 mm (8 inches) pummeled the region. A crippling storm surge of at least 3 meters (10 feet) is expected to have swamped the coast near and just northeast of the point of landfall.
The India Meteorological Department confirmed that Phailin made landfall over Gopalpur on Saturday evening with winds over 200 kph (125 mph). Phailin reached peak intensity Friday night into Saturday when the storm was the equivalent to a Category 5 hurricane or super typhoon,
Storms of this magnitude over the past couple of hundred years have often taken the lives of tens of thousands of people.