Some of the world's top climate scientists say wind and solar energy
won't be enough to head off extreme global warming, and they're asking
environmentalists to support the development of safer nuclear power as
one way to cut fossil fuel pollution.
Four scientists who have
played a key role in alerting the public to the dangers of climate
change sent letters Sunday to leading environmental groups and
politicians around the world. The letter, an advance copy of which was
given to The Associated Press, urges a crucial discussion on the role of
nuclear power in fighting climate change.
Environmentalists agree
that global warming is a threat to ecosystems and humans, but many
oppose nuclear power and believe that new forms of renewable energy will
be able to power the world within the next few decades.
That isn't realistic, the letter said.
"Those energy sources cannot scale up fast enough" to deliver the amount
of cheap and reliable power the world needs, and "with the planet
warming and carbon dioxide emissions rising faster than ever, we cannot
afford to turn away from any technology" that has the potential to
reduce greenhouse gases.
The letter signers are James Hansen, a former
top NASA scientist; Ken Caldeira, of the Carnegie Institution; Kerry
Emanuel, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Tom Wigley,
of the University of Adelaide in Australia.
Hansen began
publishing research on the threat of global warming more than 30 years
ago, and his testimony before Congress in 1988 helped launch a
mainstream discussion. Last February he was arrested in front of the
White House at a climate protest that included the head of the Sierra
Club and other activists. Caldeira was a contributor to reports from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Emanuel is known for his
research on possible links between climate change and hurricanes, and Wigley has also been doing climate research for more than 30 years.
Emanuel
said the signers aren't opposed to renewable energy sources but want
environmentalists to understand that "realistically, they cannot on
their own solve the world's energy problems."
The vast majority of climate scientists say they're now virtually certain that pollution from fossil fuels has increased global temperatures over the last 60 years. They say emissions need to be sharply reduced to prevent more extreme damage in the future.
In 2011 worldwide carbon dioxide emissions jumped 3 percent, because
of a large increase by China, the No. 1 carbon polluting country. The
U.S. is No. 2 in carbon emissions.
Hansen, who's now at Columbia
University, said it's not enough for environmentalists to simply oppose
fossil fuels and promote renewable energy.
"They're cheating
themselves if they keep believing this fiction that all we need" is
renewable energy such as wind and solar, Hansen told the AP.
The
joint letter says, "The time has come for those who take the threat of
global warming seriously to embrace the development and deployment of
safer nuclear power systems" as part of efforts to build a new global
energy supply.
Stephen Ansolabehere, a Harvard professor who
studies energy issues, said nuclear power is "very divisive" within the
environmental movement. But he added that the letter could help educate
the public about the difficult choices that climate change presents.
One
major environmental advocacy organization, the Natural Resources
Defense Council, warned that "nuclear power is no panacea for our
climate woes."
Risk of catastrophe is only one drawback of nuclear
power, NRDC President Frances Beinecke said in a statement. Waste
storage and security of nuclear material are also important issues, he
said.
"The better path is to clean up our power plants and invest in efficiency and renewable energy."
The
scientists acknowledge that there are risks to using nuclear power, but
say those are far smaller than the risk posed by extreme climate
change.
"We understand that today's nuclear plants are far from perfect."
http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/nuclear-power-global-warming-20131103
No comments:
Post a Comment