"Here's why: As of Friday, the Paris Agreement -- which calls for this zeroing-out of net carbon pollution by the end of the century -- had been ratified by 75 parties, including China, the United States and India, the top three polluters. Those 75 parties represent 58.85% of all global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the World Resources Institute. Both of those numbers are critical because the Paris Agreement "comes into force" -- basically, becomes international law -- 30 days after at least 55 countries representing at least 55% of emissions have ratified it."
"The true strength of the Paris Agreement, in my view, is that it sets a tangible goal for climate policy: Limit warming "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, which is measured as a temperature increase since the industrial revolution.
And underlying that goal: Eliminate all net carbon pollution by 2100 ... A weakness: The agreement relies on voluntary pollution-reduction pledges from its members. And if you add all of those up, as they stand, we can expect to warm the atmosphere by 2.7 degrees Celsius -- an unacceptable amount.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/opinions/sutter-paris-agreement-ratification/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment